Müller-Lyer figures with outgoing fins were back illuminated and apparent shaft-length and depth were both judged by 20 undergraduates. With the angle between the fins constant, progressive increases in fin-length produced first an increase in the apparent shaft-length and then a decrease. Changes in fin-length, however, had no significant effect on apparent depth. These data were interpreted as inconsistent with an account of the Müller-Lyer illusion in terms of perspective theory, since the latter predicts systematic changes in perceived shaft-length to be associated with systematic changes in perceived depth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DayR. H.Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation. Science, 1972, 175, 1335–1440.
2.
DenglerM.A test of constancy scaling theory in a modified Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception and Psychophysics, 1972, 12, 339–341.
3.
GregoryR. L.Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature, 1963, 199, 678–680.
4.
GregoryR. L.Reply to Brown and Houssiadas' “Illusory perception as a constancy phenomenon.”Nature, 1964, 204, 302–303.
5.
GregoryR. L.Comment on Dr. Vernon Hamilton's paper. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 73–74. (a)
6.
GregoryR. L.Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. (b)
7.
GregoryR. L.Comments on the inappropriate constancy scaling theory of the illusions and its implications. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 19, 219–223.
8.
GregoryR. L.Comments on L. E. Krueger's “disconfirming evidence” of R. L. Gregory's theory of illusions. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 540–541.
9.
HamiltonV.Susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer illusion and its relationship to differences in size constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 63–72.
10.
von HolstE.Aktive Leistungen der menschlichen Gesichtswahrnehmung. Studium Generale, 1957, 10, 231–243.
11.
HumphreyN. K., & MorganM. J.Constancy and the geometric illusions. Nature, 1965, 206, 744–745.
12.
KruegerL. E.Gregory's theory of illusions: some disconfirming evidence in the case of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 538–539.
13.
LewisE. O.Confluxion and contrast effects in the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 1909, 3, 21–41.
14.
MassaroD. W., & AndersonN. H.A test of perspective theory of geometrical illusions. American Journal of Psychology, 1970, 83, 567–575.
15.
ObanaiT.Induction effects in estimates of extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 47, 57–60.
16.
TauschE.Optische Tauschungen als artifizielle Effekte der Gestaltungsprozesse von Grössen und Formenkonstanz in der naturlichen Raumwahrnehmung. Psychologische Forschung, 1954, 24, 299–348.
