Verbal praise was administered to 60 undergraduates performing mirror tracing on hard and easy tasks either by E or a member of S's peer group. Results showed that only E's praise led to improved performance on both tasks. Verbal praise did not affect the rate of improvement. Verbal praise was interpreted as operating through an information feedback-incentive mechanism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamE. E.An analysis of change in performance quality with operant conditioning procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 480–486.
2.
AdamE. E., & ScottW. E.The application of behavioral conditioning procedures to the problems of quality control. Academy of Management Journal, 1971, 14, 175–193.
3.
FarsonR. E.Praise reappraised. Harvard Business Review, 1963, 41, 61–66.
4.
FittsP. M.Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed vs. accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 849–857.
5.
FittsP. M., & PosnerM. I.Human performance. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1967.
6.
RosenthalR.On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: the experimenter's hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. American Scientist, 1963, 51, 268–283.
7.
SchefféH.The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley, 1959.
8.
SteersR. M., & PorterL. W.The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 434–452.
