Test of the Validity of the Wilson-Patterson Conservatism Scale

Abstract

The conservatism construct has previously proved predictive of social and psychological dimensions having both practical and theoretical relevance. Its potential, however, has typically been limited by measurement imprecision due principally to the use of lengthy and potentially ambiguous verbal statements subject to either intentional or unintentional response bias. Wilson and Patterson's recently developed Conservatism Scale (C-scale) is intended to obviate the more critical sources of bias inherent in the traditional conservatism measures. In an extended test of the C-scale's validity, the present study finds 12 categories of “known groups” scoring as theoretically expected, and further shows C-scale scores consistently and significantly correlated with eight theoretically related dimensions.