From a structural point of view, conservation tasks resemble Witkin's field-dependence situations. According to our neo-Piagetian theory, therefore, the failure of certain disadvantaged black teenagers to profit from conservation training may be related to their field dependence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarclayA., & CosumanoD. R.Father absence, cross-sex identity, and field-dependent behavior in male adolescents. Child Development, 1967, 38, 243–250.
2.
BerryJ. W.Ecological and cultural factors in spatial-perceptual development. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1971, 3, 324–336.
3.
CaseR.Learning and development: A neo-Piagetian interpretation. Human Development, 1972, 15, 339–358.
4.
CaseR., & GlobersonT.Field independence and central computing space. Child Development, 1974, 45, 772–778.
5.
CohenB. D.BerentS., & SilvermanA. J.Field dependence and lateralization of function in the human brain. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1973, 28, 165–167.
6.
GillN. T.HerdtnerT. J., & LoughL.Perceptual and socio-economic variables, instruction in body orientation, and predicted academic success in young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 1175–1184.
7.
LawsonA. E., & NordlandF. H.Training and generalization of conservation in disadvantaged black teenagers: A neo-Piagetian approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 40, 503–513.
8.
Pascual-LeoneJ.Cognitive development and cognitive style: A general psychological integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Geneva, 1969.
9.
Pascual-LeoneJ.A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 1970, 32, 301–345.
10.
Pascual-LeoneJ.A neo-Piagetian process-structural model of Witkin's psychological differentiation. Paper presented at the Second Conference of the International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology, Queen's Univer., Kingston, Canada, August, 1974.
11.
ShueyA. M.The testing of Negro intelligence. (2nd ed.) New York: Social Science Press, 1966.
12.
StewartV. M.Sex and temperament revisited: A cross-cultural look at psychological differentiation in males and females. Paper presented at the Second Conference of the International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology, Queen's Univer., Kingston, Canada, August, 1974.
13.
WitkinH. A.A cognitive-style approach to cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 1967, 2, 233–250.
14.
WitkinH. A., & BerryJ. W.Psychological differentiation across cultures: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, in press.
15.
WitkinH. A.DykR. B.FatersonH. F.GoodenoughD. R., & KarpS. A.Psychological differentiation: Studies of development.New York: Wiley, 1962.
16.
WitkinH. A.OltmanP. K.CoxP. W.EhrlichmanE.HammR. M., & RinglerR. W.Field-independence and psychological differentiation: A bibliography.Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1973. (Research Bulletin)
17.
ZimilesH.Conceptual thinking in young children as a function of age and social class background. Cognitive Studies, 1970, 1, 230–241.
