40 Ss were administered a test of oral sensory perception in quiet and in white noise of 90 and 100 dB intensity. Scores indicated that there was no significant difference in performance on the oral sensory-perception task during presence of the noise. Auditory masking does not appear to be a variable of import in the functioning of the oral sensory modality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackJ.The effects of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1951, 16, 56–60.
2.
BosmaJ.Symposium on oral sensation and perception.Springfield: Thomas, 1967.
3.
BosmaJ.Second symposium on oral sensation and perception.Springfield: Thomas, 1970.
4.
La PointeL.WilliamsW.Effect of selected attachment devices on oral form recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 469–470.
5.
LeeB.Artificial stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1951, 16, 53–55.
6.
McCroskeyR.The relative contributions of auditory and tactile cues to certain aspects of speech. Southern Speech Journal, 1958, 24, 84–90.
7.
McCroskeyR.CorelyN.JacksonG.Some effects of disrupted tactile cues on the productions of consonants. Southern Speech Journal, 1959, 25, 55–60.
