Abstract
An attempt was made to detect possible effects of familiarization (“training effect”) in the interpretation of data collected repeatedly on children. During a longitudinal study on child growth we looked for such effects on different performance tests done at various ages. We noticed that work capacity tests (PWC170; V̇O2 max) were occasionally subjected to interferences from familiarization. We conclude that a proper interpretation of repeated measurements must take into account possible biases originating from “training effect.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
