24 Ss denied sight of their hands during exposure to visual displacement induced by prism spectacles showed compensatory aftereffects if and only if a discordance between the visual and proprioceptive directions of targets existed during the exposure period.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BauerJ. A.WoodsG. D.HeldR.A device for rapid recording of positioning responses in two dimensions. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1969, 1, 157–159.
2.
GoodwinG. M.McCloskeyD. I.MatthewsP. B. C.The contribution of muscle afferents to kinesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain, 1972, 95, 705–748.
3.
HarrisC. S.Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 419–444.
4.
HeldR.Exposure-history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 1961, 32, 26–32.
5.
HeldR.Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American, 1965, 213, 84–94.
6.
HeldR.FreedmanS.Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science, 1963, 142, 455–462.
7.
HeldR.HeinA.Adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination contingent upon re-afferent stimulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1958, 8, 87–90.
8.
HeldR.SchlankM.Adaptation to disarranged eye-hand coordination in the distance dimension. American Journal of Psychology, 1959, 72, 603–605.
9.
HelmholtzH. v. Treatise on physiological optics. New York: Dover, 1962. (Reprint).
10.
HowardI.TempletonW.Human spatial orientation. New York: Wiley, 1966.
11.
KravitzJ.WallachH.Adaptation to displaced vision contingent upon vibrating stimulation. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 3, 465–469.
12.
LacknerJ.A device for investigating adaptation to sensory rearrangement. Journal of Psychology, 1973, 85, 137–141.
13.
McCloskeyD. I.Differences between the senses of movement and position shown by the effects of loading and vibration of muscles in man. Brain Research, 1973, 61, 119–131.
14.
MonsterA. W.HermanR.AltlandN. R.Effect of the peripheral and central “sensory” component in the calibration of position. In DesmedtJ. E. (Ed.), New developments in emg and clinical neurophysiology. Basel, Switz.: Karger, 1973. Vol. 3. Pp. 383–403.
15.
PaillardJ.BrouchonM.Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In FreedmanS. (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1968. Pp. 37–55.
16.
RockI.The nature of perceptual adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
17.
WallachH.Informational discrepancy as a basis of perceptual adaptation. In FreedmanS. (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1968. Pp. 209–229.
