Abstract
This study examined whether novelty-seeking is related to individual differences in verbal behavior and information processing. Assessment was made of self-reported preferences for kinds (cognitions, sensations) and sources (internal, external) of varied stimulation, internal scanning (defined in terms of the availability of alternate word meanings), and interference proneness (Stroop Color-Word Test). It was hypothesized that internal-cognitizers would do more internal scanning and that external-sensation seekers would be more interference prone. Relationships were in the predicted direction but they were nonsignificant. The results suggest a need for understanding the relationship between self-reported preference for novelty and manifestations of novelty-production in behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
