A new variable, strategies in judging laterality of others, is proposed. 50 female undergraduates who visualized their own body turns (“rotators”) in judging which hand was elevated by the facing examiner scored higher on EPPS need Achievement than females using an “opposite-hand” strategy (n = 65). Rotators' relative ego-centeredness was suggested. Need affiliation was associated with insignificant results but in the predicted direction. Time metaphor and color preferences, although related to need Achievement in the literature, were unrelated to perception of laterality. The responses of 83 males showed no significant differences on any of the measures.
CulverC. M.CohenS. I.SilvermanA. J.ShmavonianB. M.Cognitive structuring, field dependence-independence and the psychophysiological response to perceptual isolation. In WortisJ. (Ed.), Recent advances in biological psychiatry. Vol. VI. New York: Plenum, 1964. Pp. 119–128.
3.
EdwardsA. L.Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. New York: Psychological Corp., 1959.
4.
GerstmannJ.Fingeragnosie. Eine umschribene Störung der Orientierung am eigenen Körpor. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 1924, 37, 1010–1012.
5.
GordonH.Hand and ear tests. British Journal of Psychology, 1922–23, 13, 283–300.
6.
HeadH.Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Brain, 1920, 43, 87–165.
7.
KnappR. H. n achievement and aesthetic preference. In AtkinsonJ. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1958. Pp. 367–372.
8.
KnappR. H.GarbuttJ. T.Time imagery and the achievement motive. Journal of Personality, 1958, 26, 426–434.
