Estimates of size and ratings of ‘friendliness’ of an interior presented as a slide and as an hologram are compared for different orders of presentation. The effect of mode of presentation relates to the sequence in which judgments are made. Implications for the potential use of holograms in perceptual studies of architectural variables are indicated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CanterD. V. (Ed.) Architectural psychology. London: RIBA Publ., 1970.
2.
CanterD. V., & WoolsR.A technique for the subjective appraisal of buildings. Building Science, 1970, 5, 187–198.
3.
LauJ. J.Differences between full-size and scale model rooms in the assessment of lighting quality. In CanterD. V. (Ed.), Architectural psychology. London: RIBA Publ., 1970. Pp. 43–48.
4.
WoolsR. M.The assessment of room friendliness. In CanterD. V. (Ed.), Architectural psychology. London: RIBA Publ., 1970. Pp. 48–55.
5.
WoolsR. M., & CanterD. V.The effect of the meaning of buildings on behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 1970, 1, 144–150.
