Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Birth order and field-independence research has produced seemingly similar findings concerning social dependence. However, of the few empirical efforts examining such similarities, methodological differences have produced ambiguous findings. The effects of sex and three birth-order categories on Rod-and-frame scores were evaluated for 248 male and 389 female psychiatric inpatients. A 2 × 3 analysis of variance showed significant sex and birth-order effects, with males and firstborns less field-dependent than females and both later-borns and only children, respectively. The unpredicted birth-order results essentially contradicted previous findings and were discussed in terms of sample differences and the apparent need for improved social-dependency measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker

Carroll

Ordinal position and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 129–131.

Becker

S. W.

Lerner

M. J.

Carroll

Conformity as a function of birth order, payoff, and type of group pressure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 318–323.

Culver

C. M.

Dunham

Birth order and spatial-perceptual ability: Negative note. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 28, 301–302.

Gerard

H. B.

Rabbie

J. M.

Fear and social comparison. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 586–592.

Haeberle

Interactions of sex, birth order, and dependency with behavior problems in emotionally disturbed pre-school children. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, 1958.

Kinsolving

D. L.

Bone

R. N.

Firstborns, only children, sex and field independence. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 126.

McDonald

A. P.

Manifestations of different levels of socialization by birth order. Developmental Psychology, 1969, 1, 485–492.

Neville

C. W.

Jr. Workman

S. N.

Johnson

D. T.

Expected scores in the RFT: Field independence is where you find it. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 15, 321–322.

Pemberton

C. L.

The closure factors related to temperament. Journal of Personality, 1952, 21, 159–175.

10.

Sampson

E. E.

Birth order, need achievement, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 155–159.

11.

Schachter

The psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford Univer. Press, 1959.

12.

Sears

R. R.

Ordinal position in the family as a psychological variable. American Sociological Review, 1950, 15, 297–301.

13.

Simon

W. E.

Wilde

Ordinal position of birth, field dependency, and Forer's measure of gullibiliry. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 677–678.

14.

Stewart

R. H.

Birth order and dependency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 192–194.

15.

Walters

R. H.

Ray

Anxiety, social isolation, and reinforcer effectiveness. Journal of Personality, 1960, 28, 358–367.

16.

Warren

J. R.

Birth order and social behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65, 39–49.

17.

Winer

B. J.

Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

18.

Witkin

H. A.

The perception of the upright. Scientific American, 1959, 200, 50–70.

19.

Witkin

H. A.

Dyk

R. B.

Faterson

H. F.

Goodenough

D. R.

Karp

S. A.

Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: Wiley, 1962.

20.

Witkin

H. A.

Lewis

H. B.

Hertzman

Machover

Meissner

P. B.

Wapner

Personality through perception. New York: Harper, 1954.

21.

Wrightsman

L. S.

Jr.

Effects of waiting with others on changes in level of felt anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 216–222.

22.

Zimbardo

Formica

Emotional comparison and self-esteem as determinants of affiliation. Journal of Personality, 1963, 31, 141–162.

23.

Zucker

R. A.

Manosevitz

Lanyon

R. I.

Birth order, anxiety, and affiliation during a crisis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 8, 354–359.

Effects of Birth Order and Sex on Field Independence-Dependence

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References