An orthogonal design was used to evaluate the relative effectiveness of motor and vocal correction for adult Ss learning a 15-pair discrimination task. Both affected performance, but vocal correction had a considerably stronger effect and combined motor and vocal correction was not more effective than vocal correction alone. It was noted that the variability of performance, as well as the mean number of errors, was reduced by correction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarmeanS. L.Effects of pattern of auxiliary activity on discrimination learning of children. Child Development, 1969, 40, 928–934.
2.
CarmeanS. L.Procedure, timing, and task difficulty as moderators of the effect of vocalization of choices during discrimination learning. Child Development, 1973, in press.
3.
CarmeanS. L.CarmeanC. J.Position strategies in an object discrimination task. Child Development, 1971, 42, 1263–1270.
4.
CarmeanS. L.WeirM. W.Effects of verbalizations on discrimination learning and retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967, 6, 545–550.
5.
McLachlanJ. C.CarmeanS. L.Visual discrimination learning as a function of mode of auxiliary activity and instructed information. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 25, 106–108.
