Test-retest rs over a period of 1 yr. are presented for scores from group tests of cognitive controls and intellectual abilities for which validity and split-half or short-form reliability estimates were reported earlier by Gardner and Lohrenz (1969). In spite of limitations on the possible reliabilities of certain scores, the reliability estimates obtained for these time-saving group procedures suggest that they can be used effectively for most purposes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClaytonM. B.JacksonD. N.Equivalence range, acquiescence, and overgeneralization. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1961, 21, 371–382.
2.
GardnerR. W.LohrenzL. J.Some old and new group tests of cognitive controls and intellectual abilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 29, 935–950.
3.
GardnerR. W.LongR. I.The stability of cognitive controls. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 485–487.
4.
GardnerR. W.MoriartyA.Personality development at preadolescence: explorations of structure formation. Seattle: Univer. of Washington Press, 1968.
5.
GardnerR. W.SchoenR. A.Differentiation and abstraction in concept formation. Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76, No. 41 (Whole No. 560).
6.
RosettH. L.RobbinsH.WatsonW. S.Standardization and construct validity of the Physiognomic Cue Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 403–420.
