Undergraduates were administered a probability learning task to determine the relationship between birth order and the relative effectiveness of social and nonsocial reinforcers. Firstborn individuals performed better than later-born Ss under social reinforcement conditions. Over-all, social reinforcers enhanced performance more than nonsocial reinforcers. Findings were interpreted as supporting greater social dependence of firstborns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FischerE. H.HerschbergerA. C.WinerD.The verbal reinforcement technique in personality research. Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, 83, 79–89.
2.
GilmoreJ. B.ZiglerE.Birth order and social reinforcer effectiveness in children. Child Development, 1964, 35, 193–200.
3.
HinesG. H.Effectiveness of social and nonsocial reinforcers in a probability learning task. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 23, 411–413.
4.
MoranG.Ordinal position and approval motivation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967, 31, 319–320.
5.
SchachterS.The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univer. Press, 1959.
6.
StewartR. H.Birth order and dependency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 192–194.
7.
WatsonP.Response measure effects in children as a function of type and schedule of reward. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 13, 217–218.
