The ability to sustain visual attention was compared in 13 aphasic and 13 non-aphasic children. The aphasic children gave significantly more errors on the visual vigilance task than their controls. The difference remained under visual distraction but no significant performance reductions resulted. It was concluded that several of the aphasic children showed significant attentional deficits. The data support a need for systemaric clinical evaluation of attention in children with central language disorders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerryM.Language disorders in children: The bases and diagnosis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
2.
BirchH. G.BelmontI.Auditory-visual integration in brain-damaged and normal children. Develpm. Med. Child Neurol., 1965, 7, 135–144. (a)
3.
BirchH. G.BelmontI.Auditory-visual integration, intelligence, and reading ability in school age children. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 20, 295–305. (b)
4.
BirchH. G.LeffordA.Intersensory development in children. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Develpm., 1963, 28, No. 89.
ChalfantJ. C.ScheffelinM. A.Central processing dysfunctions in children: A review of research. Bethesda: U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, NINDS, 1969. (Monogr. No. 9)
7.
CrosbyK. K.Attention and distractibility in mentally retarded children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston Univer., 1969.
8.
CruickshankW.Brain-damaged children in home, school and society. Syracuse: Syracuse Univer. Press, 1967.
9.
DunnL.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Assoc., 1959.
10.
FedioP.MirskyA. F.Selective intellectual deficits in children with temporal lobe or centrencephalic epilepsy. Neuropsychologia, 1969, 7, 287–300.
11.
FisherL.Attention deficit in brain-damaged children. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1970, 74, 502–508.
12.
GoodenoughF. L.Measurement of intelligence by drawings. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N. Y.: World Book, 1926.
13.
HardyW.On language disorders in young children: A reorganizaron of thinking. In FriersonE. C.BarbeW. B. (Eds.), Educating children with learning disabilities: Selected readings. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967. Pp. 36–51.
14.
JohnsonD. J.MyklebustH. R.Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967.
15.
MackworthJ.Vigilance and attention. Baltimore Penguin, 1970.
16.
McGinnisM.Aphasic children. Washington, D. C.Volta But., 1963.
17.
MechamM. J.BerkoM. J.BerkoF. G.MechamM. J.BerkoM. J.BerkoF. G.PalmerM. F. (Eds.) Communication training in childhood brain damage. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1966.
18.
RosvoldH. E.MirskyA. F.SarasonI.BransomeE.BeckL.A continuous performance test of brain damage. J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 343–350.
19.
SchulmanJ. L.KasparJ. C.ThroneF. M.Brain damage and behavior: A clinical experimental study. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1965.
20.
SemelM.Arousal theory and vigilance behavior of educable menrally retarded and average children. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1965, 70, 38–47.
21.
StraussA. A.LehtinenL.Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child. Vol. 1. New York. Grune & Stratton, 1947.
22.
WoodN.Delayed speech and language development. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
