Os made judgments of the apparent rate of magnification of an approaching object as a cue to its distance. Os were separated into 2 groups of 20 on the basis of their relative field dependency. Os viewed a radially moving target which provided the sensation of movement in depth. 2 target sizes and 2 values of rate of movement were used. Half of each group of 20 Os viewed the large target, and 10 viewed the small target, but at both rates of movement. Os were to judge if the target appeared near or far. A significantly larger proportion of near judgments were associated with the high rate of movement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoerjessonE.Properties of changing patterns evoking visually perceived oscillation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 303–308.
2.
GuilfordJ. P.Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
3.
HolwayA. H.BoringE. G.Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variants. American Journal of Psychology, 1941, 54, 21–37.
4.
KuennapasT.Distance perception as a function of available visual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 523–529.
5.
SchiffW.The perception of impending collision a study of visually directed avoidance behavior. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1965, 79, No. 11 (Whole No. 604).
6.
SchiffW.CavinessJ. A.GibsonJ. J.Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of “looming”Science, 1962, 136, 982–983.
7.
TonW. H.Perceptual style and the detection of motion in depth. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 34, 432–428.
8.
WitkinH. A.LewisH. B.HertzmanM.MachoverK.MeissnerP. B.WapnerS.Personality through perception: An experimental and clinical study. New York. Harper, 1954.
