Two studies of the influence of sex on aesthetic behaviour of art purchasers show significant effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarettH. O.Sex differences in art ability. Journal of Educational Research, 1950, 43, 398–400.
2.
BernardY.Construction d'un test de connaissance en peintute. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Appliquee, 1970, 19, 125–131.
3.
BernardY.Elements pour une etude des mecanismes de reference esthetique. Sciences de l'Art1970, 7, 7–13.
4.
BernardY.Aits sociaux et jugements de gout. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, 1970, 2, 179–196.
5.
ChildI. L.IwaoS.Comparisons of color preferences in college students of Japan and the U. S. A. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Conventions of the American Psychological Associative, 1969, 4, 469–470.
6.
ChoungourianA.Color preferences and cultural variations. Perceptual and Motor Stills, 1968, 25, 1203–1206.
7.
EurichA. C.CarollH. A.Group differences in art judgment. School and Society, 1931, 34, 204–205.
8.
FrumkinR. M.Sex, Familiarity and ugmatism as factors in painting preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 1–12.
9.
JohnsonO.KnappR. H.S differences in aesthetic preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 1963, 61, 279–301.
10.
KnappR. H.BrimmerJ.WhiteM.Educational level class status and aesthetic preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 1959, 50, 277–284.
11.
ObstF.A comparison of teachers candidate groups on the Allport, Vernon, Lindzey Aesthetic scale. California Journal of Educational Research, 1966, 17, 181–185.
12.
ProthroE. R.PerryH. T.Group differences in performance on the Meier Art Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1950, 34, 96–97.
