Investigations were carried out to determine whether the difference between good and poor coders of equal CA and IQ was accounted for by (a) differential recall of the symbols and associates and (b) by differential application of a labeling strategy. Group differences were found in recall. Training in labeling improved coding performance of both groups but not differentially.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenJ.The factorial structure of the WISC at ages 7-6. 10-6, and 13-6. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1959, 23, 285–299.
2.
ColemanJ. C.RasofB.Intellectual factors in learning disorders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 139–152.
3.
GaultU.Factorial patterns of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1954, 6, 85–90.
4.
GoyenJ. D.LyleJ. G.Effect of incentives and age on the visual recognition of retarded readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1971, 11, 266–273.
5.
HammerA. G.A factor analysis of the Bellevue tests. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1950, 1, 108–114.
6.
JohnsonE. G.LyleJ. G.Analysis of WISC Coding: 1. Figural reversibility. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 34, 195–198.
