Abstract
The claim of Witkin, et al. that perceptual field-dependence (as measured by the Rod-and-frame Test and the Embedded-figures Test) is a global trait that cuts across levels of intelligence and psychopathology in a meaningful way is critically examined on the basis of this study. 60 randomly selected patients from Bronx State Hospital and 30 of their therapists were administered the tests. There were wide differences between correlations of scores on the two tests in the patient population and in that of the therapists, challenging the claim for the globality of perceptual field-dependence. Subdividing the patients along the lines of psychopathology suggested by Witkin failed to show significant differences in test performances. The adequacy of this simple two-dimensional category to meaningfully differentiate among patient populations is challenged. A multidimensional model such as that of J. Silverman, et al. seems more appropriate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.