In Exp. 1, Ss were asked to read under normal and .2-sec. DAF conditions. 3 sets of instructions and statements about effects of DAF were used for groups of males and females. In Exp. 2, the same reading conditions were used. Ss were either given 1 of 2 pre-recorded models or no information prior to DAF experience. In both studies, no significant differences due to type of preparation for DAF were noted. Under the conditions used, DAF reaction seems unaffected by expectancy of Ss.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonC. J.Adaptation to delayed sidetone. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1953, 18, 386–391.
2.
AtkinsonC. J.A study of vocal responses during controlled aural stimulation. Dissertation Abstracts, 1954, 65, 19–22.
3.
GoldiamondI.Stuttering and fluency as manipulatable operant response classes. In KrasnerL.UllmannL. P. (Eds.), Research in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1966 Pp. 106–156.
4.
KlineM. V.GuzeH.HaggertyA. D.An experimental study of the nature of hypnotic deafness: Effects of delayed speech feedback. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1954, 2, 145–156.
PetersR. W.The effect of changes in sidetone delay and level upon rate of oral reading of normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1954, 19, 483–490.
