Abstract
A female kinkajou was trained on both spatial and visual (brightness) probability learning problems. Results on the 70:30 spatial task involving a correction procedure indicated that S maximized within 160 trials. Training on a 50:50 spatial task was interspersed between the 70:30 spatial task and the visual tasks. The first visual task introduced was a 60:40 brightness discrimination involving a correction procedure and which lasted for 980 trials. This was followed by a 70:30 brightness task involving a noncorrection procedure which lasted for 1000 trials. Results on both brightness tasks showed non-random (reward following) matching. The results of both the spatial and visual tasks were interpreted in terms of Bitterman's phyletic hypothesis of intelligence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
