30 men and 30 women read paragraphs under no DAF and 5 different DAF conditions. No differences were found in reactions of men and women when DAF conditions were randomized. When DAF conditions were ordered, women tended to adapt significantly more than men.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonC. J.A study of vocal responses during controlled aural stimulation. Dissertation Abstracts, 1954, 65, 19–22.
2.
FairbanksG.Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1955, 20, 333–345.
3.
GoldiamondI.Stuttering and fluency as manipulatable operant response classes. In KrasnerL.UllmannL. P. (Eds.), Research in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rineharr, & Winston, 1966. Pp. 106–156.
4.
KingD. J.DodgeA.The influence of oral recall on immediate and delayed memory for meaningful material practiced under delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Psychology, 1965, 59, 141–147.
5.
MahaffeyR. D.StromstaC. P.[The effects of auditory feedback as a function of frequency, intensity, time, and sex.]De Therapia Vocis et Loquelae, 1965, 20, 233–235.
RankinR. J.Delayed auditory feedback as a method of manipulating anxiety in a paired associate learning task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 25, 273–277.
8.
SchefféH.The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley, 1959.
9.
StromstaC.Methodology related to the determination of the phase angle of bone-conducted speech sound energy of stutterers and non-stutterers. Dissertation Abstracts, 1956, 16, 1738.
10.
TylerL. E.The psychology of human differences. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
