A conceptualization of field dependence-independence as a motivational orientation reflected in attentional selectivity and autonomic activity was tested using an incidental learning paradigm. 60 Ss assigned to a structured or unstructured condition were exposed to social and neutral incidental material; basal skin resistance was recorded. Results indicated that field-dependent Ss reflect social motivation by high non-specific “arousal” and by learning incidental material of a social nature. Field-independent Ss reflect task motivation by becoming “aroused” in response to specific task requirements and by learning task-relevant incidental material.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellerE. K.A study of dependency and perceptual orientation. American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 347. (Abstract)
2.
CohenJ.Multiple regression as a general data analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70 (6 Pt. 1), 426–445.
CulverC. M.CohenS. I.SilvermanS. J.ShmavonianD. M.Cognitive structuring, field-dependence-independence and the psychophysiological response to perceptual isolation. In WordsJ. (Ed.), Recent advances in biological psychiatry. Vol. 6. New York: Plenum Press, 1964. Pp. 119–128.
5.
EagleM.FitzgibbonsD.GoldbergerL.Field dependence and memory for relevant and irrelevant incidental stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 23, 1035–1038.
6.
FitzgibbonsD.GoldbergerL.EagleM.Field dependence and memory for incidental material. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 743–749.
7.
FitzgibbonsD.GoldbergerL.EagleM.Field-dependence, incidental learning and arousal. Paper presented at EPA annual meeting, New York, April, 1966.
8.
HeinP.CohenS.ShmavonianB. M.Perceptual mode and Pavlovian typology. In WortisJ. (Ed.), Recent advances in biological psychiatry. Vol. 7. New York: Plenum Press, 1965. Pp. 71–78.
9.
HeronW.Cognitive and physiological effects of perceptual isolation. In SolomonP.MendelsonJ.TrumbullR.SolomonP.MendelsonJ.TrumbullR.WexerP. (Eds.), Sensory deprivation. Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Press, 1961. Pp. 7–13.
10.
JacobsonG. R.Effects of brief sensory deprivation on field dependence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966, 3, 115–118.
11.
KonstadtN.FormanE.Field dependence and external directedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 490–493.
12.
KurieG. D.MordkoffA. M.Effects of brief sensory deprivation and somatic concentration upon two measures of field dependence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 683–687.
13.
MessickS.DamarinF.Cognitive style and memory for faces. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 313–318.
14.
OltmanP. K.A portable rod-and-frame apparatus. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 503–506.
15.
SilvermanA. J.CohenS. I.ShmavonianB. M.GreenbergG.Psychophysiological investigations in sensory deprivation: The body-field dimension. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1961, 23, 48–61.
16.
WitkinH. A.LewisH. B.HertzmanM.MachoverK.MeissnerP. B.WapnerS.Personality through perception. New York: Harper, 1954.
17.
WoodworthR. S.SchlosbergH.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
