The effects of positive, negative, and combined social reinforcement on the accuracy of motor performance among 25 preschool boys and 25 girls was determined. Reinforcement was administered on a contingency basis. Arithmetic error indicated significant differences between the sexes for initial trials. No significant social reinforcement effects were obtained. The failure of social reinforcement to influence complex motor performance was explained by the lack of control by an individual in varying his own performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GatesG. S.RisslandL. Q.The effect of encouragement and of discouragement upon performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1923, 14, 21–26.
2.
GounardB. R.Effects of praise and censure on normal Ss' performance on a psychomotor task. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 15, 99–100.
3.
McManisD. L.Pursuit-rotor performance of normal and retarded in four verbal incentive conditions. Child Development, 1965, 36, 667–683.
4.
PartonD. A.RossA. O.Social reinforcement of children's motor behavior: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 65–73.
5.
RobertsG. C.MartensR.Social reinforcement and complex motor performance. Research Quarterly, 1970, 41, 175–181.
6.
SparksJ. L.Relative effects of various verbal incentives on learning and retention of a gross motor skill. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State Univer., 1963.
7.
SteinA. H.The influence of social reinforcement on the achievement behavior of fourth grade boys and girls. Child Development, 1969, 40, 727–736.
8.
StevensonH. W.CruseD. B.The effectiveness of social reinforcement with normal and feebleminded children. Journal of Personality, 1961, 29, 124–135.
9.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
10.
WrightD.Social reinforcement and maze learning in children. Child Development, 1968, 39, 177–183.
