65 college women were placed in one of five groups to learn the pursuit-rotor task. Four of the groups practiced mentally at various designated points during the overt practice context; the fifth practiced without any directed mental rehearsal. Using various statistical analyses, no significant differences were found between the groups, although a trend indicated some value of early introduction of mental rehearsal within the context of overt practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurnsP. L.The effect of physical practice, mental practice and mental-physical practice on the development of a motor skill. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State Univer., 1962.
2.
ClarkL. V.Effect of mental practice on the development of a certain motor skill. Res. Quart., 1960, 31, 560–569.
3.
CorbinC. B.Effects of mental practice on skill development after controlled practice. Res. Quart., 1967, 38, 534–538.
4.
DuffB. A.The relative effectiveness of physical practice and combined mental and physical practice in improving the underhand free throw as used in basketball. Unpublished master's thesis, Univer. of Colorado, 1964.
5.
EgstromG. H.Effects of an emphasis on conceptualizing techniques during early learning of a motor skill. Res. Quart., 1964, 35, 472–481.
6.
HuffmanI.A study of the effects of mental practice on motor learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Univer. of Oregon, 1963.
7.
PerryH. M.The relative efficiency of actual and imaginary practice in five selected tasks. Arch. Psychol., 1939, No. 243, 1–76.
8.
TuftsS.The effects of mental practice and physical practice on the scores of intermediate bowlers. Unpublished master's thesis, Univer. of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1963.
9.
TwiningW. E.Mental practice and physical practice in learning a motor skill. Res. Quart., 1949, 20, 432–435.
10.
VandellR.DavisR.ClugstonH.The function of mental practice in the acquisition of motor skills. J. gen. Psychol., 1943, 29, 243–250.
