The present study was conducted to test Lovejoy's attentional hypothesis concerning the effect of difficulty in a discrimination task on the overtraining reversal effect (ORE). Results indicated that either criterion or overtraining on a difficult problem produced efficient reversal acquisition. However, significantly rapid reversal performance only occurred when overtraining was combined with a difficult discrimination. Lovejoy's approach to the ORE was supported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirchD.IsonJ. R.SperlingS. E.Reversal learning under single stimulus presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 36–40.
2.
BrunerJ. S.MandlerJ. M.O'DowdD.WallachM. A.The role of overlearning and drive level in reversal learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958, 51, 607–613.
3.
CapaldiE. J.StevensonH. W.Response reversal following different amounts of training. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1957, 50, 195–198.
4.
D'AmatoM. R.JagodaH.Analysis of the role of overlearning in discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 61, 45–50.
5.
HullC. L.Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton, 1943.
6.
LovejoyE.Analysis of the overlearning reversal effect. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 87–103.
7.
MackintoshN. J.The effects of overtraining on a reversal and a nonreversal shift. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962, 55, 555–559.
8.
MackintoshN. J.Overtraining, reversal, and extinction in rats and chicks. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965, 59, 31–36. (a)
PubolsB. H.Jr.The facilitation of visual and spatial discrimination reversal by overlearning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956, 49, 243–248.
11.
ReidL. S.The development of noncontinuity behavior through continuity learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953, 46, 107–112.
12.
SitterleyT. E.CapehartJ. E.Human successive discrimination reversal: Effects of overtraining and reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 4, 293–294.
13.
SutherlandN. S.Stimulus analyzing mechanisms. In Proceedings of a symposium on the mechanization of thought processes. Vol. 2. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1959. Pp. 575–609.
14.
SutherlandN. S.HolgateV.Two-cue discrimination learning in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966, 61, 198–207.
15.
TemponeV. J.CapehartJ. E.AtwoodG. L.GoldingS.The overtraining reversal effect under two types of discrimination. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 5, 229–230.
