Abstract
A total of 15 intellectual and 12 sensory motor variables were examined as predictors of brain damage in a neurological and a psychiatric population. Results obtained via Student's t tests and multiple-regression analyses demonstrate chat it is possible to predict brain damage in both clinical populations. Specific conclusions were: (1) as single predictor variables, sensory motor measures are superior to intellectual measures, (2) brain damage as measured behaviorally is consistent across the two populations, (3) there is a greater incidence of false positives in a psychiatric than a neurological population, and (4) multiple-variant prediction seems to hold promise for identification of brain damage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
