Satisfactory test-retest (.81) and interjudge (.91) reliabilities were obtained on a measure of proportionality for male figure drawings utilizing 20 college students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradshawD.A study of group consistencies on the DAP test in relation to personality projection. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Catholic Univer., 1952.
2.
GuilfordJ. P.Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
3.
LehnerG. F. J., & GundersonE. K.Reliability of graphic indices in a projective test (Draw-A-Person). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1952, 8, 125–128.
4.
LevyB. I., & MinskyR.Manual for the assessment of the accuracy of drawings of human figures. Washington, D. C.: Author, 1962.
5.
LevyB. I.MinskyR., & LomaxS.An underlying variable in the clinical evaluation of drawings of human figures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1963, 27, 508–512.
6.
MachoverK.Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1949.
7.
SwensenC. H.Jr.Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings. Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 431–466.
8.
SwensenC. H.Jr.Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings, 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 20–44.
9.
WagnerN. E., & SchubertN. J. P.D.A.P. quality scale for late adolescents and young adults. Kenmore, N. Y.: Delaware Letter Shop, 1955.
