Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Several variables which might be useful in explaining the relationship between frequency of exposure and attitudinal liking are investigated. Complexity of the stimuli and their familiarity were the major variables of interest. Also involved were the sex of Ss and the individual stimuli. Four sets of stimuli were presented 20 times to independent groups of Ss, with scale ratings taken on the 1st and 20th presentations. The results showed that familiarity and complexity interacted in a complex fashion for liking. For highly familiar stimuli, an inverse relationship between complexity and affect held (p = .10), but for novel stimuli a significant direct relationship held. Implications of the data for the hypothesized relationship of affect and complexity were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlyne

D. E.

Conflict, curiosity, and exploratory behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

Berlyne

D. E.

Craw

M. A.

Salapatek

P. H.

, & Lewis

J. L.

Novelty, complexity, incongruity, extrinsic motivation, and the GSR. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 560–567.

Eisenman

, & Robinson

Generality of some complexity-simplicity measures related to creativity. Proceedings, 76th Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, 1968, 3, 441–442.

Harrison

A. A.

Response competition, frequency, exploratory behavior, and liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 363–368.

Hellyer

, & Straughan

J. H.

Alternation as function of preliminary training and type of deprivation. Science, 1961, 133, 1422–1423.

Jakobovits

L. A.

Effects of mere exposure: a comment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 1968, 9, No. 2, Part 2.

Jakobovits

L. A.

, & Lambert

W. E.

Stimulus-characteristics as determinants of semantic changes with repeated presentation. American Journal of Psychology, 1964, 77, 84–92.

Karwoski

T. F.

Gramlick

F. W.

, & Arnott

Psychological studies in semantics: I. Free association reactions to words, drawings, and objects. Journal of Social Psychology, 1944, 20, 233–247.

Reich

J. W.

Stimulus complexity mediation of categorization behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 723–732. (a)

10.

Reich

J. W.

Stimulus and personality complexity in maintenance of categorization behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 1079–1090. (b)

11.

Reich

J. W.

, & Alexander

R. A.

Stimulus property mediation of paired-associates learning. Journal of General Psychology, in press.

12.

Reich

J. W.

, & Woolford

Stimulus novelty and mediation as factors in categorization complexity. Journal of General Psychology, 1969, in press.

13.

Terwilliger

R. F.

Pattern complexity and affective arousal. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 17, 387–395.

14.

Wohlwill

J. F.

Stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D. C., April, 1968.

15.

Zajonc

R. B.

Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 1968, 9, No. 2, Part 2.

Stimulus Properties,Frequency of Exposure,and Affective Responding

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References