Performance of college students on the Squares Test was related to immediate and delayed recognition of unfamiliar concept names in a representational learning task. Although previous research has not substantiated predictions from the assimilation model when the task involved associative learning, the present study clearly indicated (p < .01) the superiority of “sharpeners” to “levelers” in representational learning with the stimulus phrases embedded in prose material and low-meaning response terms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoxD. E. P.A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria. Biometrika, 1949, 36, 141–146.
2.
GardnerR. W.HolzmanP. A.KleinG. S.LintonH., & SpenceD. P.Cognitive control, a study of individual consistencies in cognitive behavior. Psychological Issues, 1959, 1, No. 4.
3.
GardnerR. W.JacksonD. N., & MessickS. J.Personality organization in cognitive controls and intellectual abilities. Psychological Issues, 1960, 11, No. 4.
4.
GardnerR. W., & LohrenzL. J.Leveling-sharpening and serial reproduction of a story. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1960, 24, 295–304.
5.
GardnerR. W., & LongR. I.Cognitive controls as determinants of learning and remembering. Psychologia, 1960, 3, 165–171. (a)
6.
GardnerR. W., & LongR. I.Leveling-sharpening and serial learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1960, 10, 179–185. (b)
7.
HollingworthH. S.Experimental studies in judgment. Archives of Psychology, 1913, 29, 44–52.
8.
HolzmanP. S., & GardnerR. W.Leveling-sharpening and memory organization. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 176–180.
9.
NicksT. L.Jr.The relationship between the leveling-sharpening principle of cognitive control and retroactive inhibition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Boston, 1961.
10.
SiegalR. S.The leveling-sharpening system principle, serial learning and retroactive interference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Kansas, 1957.
