Short-Term Visual Restriction in Visual and Auditory Discrimination

Abstract

This study explored the effect of sensory restriction on perceptual thresholds. The experimental predictions were formulated from Lindsley's model of the reticular activating system (RAS). Attention was focused upon changes in the visual CFF threshold, loudness discrimination and pitch discrimination as related to two levels of visual restriction. Ss were 60 male volunteers. Statistical analysis included analysis of covariance followed by a priori group comparisons. Statistical support (p < .05) was found for 3 of 4 general hypotheses. It was concluded that the RAS attempts to maintain cortical arousal at an optional level by regulating stimulus input. A reduction in this input apparently lowers perceptual thresholds in the sensory system restricted and other systems as well.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brodal

, & Rossi

G. F.

Ascending fibers in brain stem reticular formation of cat. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1955, 74, 68.

Doane

B. K.

Mabatoo

Heron

, & Scott

T. H.

Changes in perceptual function after isolation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1959, 13, 210–219.

Goldberger

, & Holt

R. R.

Experimental interference with reality contact: method and group results. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 1958, 127, 99–112.

Jasper

H. H.

Thalamocortical integrating mechanisms. In Bard

(Ed.), Patterns of organization in the central nervous system. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1952. Pp. 493–511.

Kleitman

N. S.

Sleep and wakefulness. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1963.

Lilly

J. C.

Mental effects of reduction of ordinary levels of physical stimuli on intact, healthy persons. Psychiatric Research Reports, 1956, 5, 1–9.

Lindsley

D. B.

Common factors in sensory deprivation, sensory distortion and sensory overload. In Solomon

Kubzansky

P. E.

Leiderman

P. H.

Mendelson

J. H.

Trumbull

, & Wexler

(Eds.), Sensory deprivation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univer. Press, 1961. Pp. 174–194.

Moruzzi

, & Magoun

H. W.

Brainstem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1949, 1, 455–473.

Ormiston

D. W.

The effects of sensory deprivation on apparent movement thresholds. Dissertation Abstracts, 1958, 18, 2200–2201.

10.

Rosenzweig

Sensory deprivation and schizophrenia: some clinical and theoretical similarities. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1959, 116, 326–329.

11.

Schultz

D. P.

Sensory restriction. New York: Academic Press, 1965.

12.

Seashore

C. E.

Lewis

, & Saetveit

J. G.

The Seashore Test of Musical Talents. New York: Psychological Corp., 1939.

13.

Solomon

Sensory deprivation, a review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1957, 114, No. 4.

14.

Vernon

Sensory deprivation and pain thresholds. Science, 1961, 132, 330–331.

15.

Weinberger

, & Lindsley

Behavioral and EEG arousal to contrasting novel stimulation. Science, 1964, 134, 1355–1357.

16.

Winer

B. J.

Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.