60 pairs of adolescents (N = 120) were drawn from three academic status groups (N = 176); 30 pairs on the basis of mutual attraction (‘friends’) and 30 pairs on the basis of mutual dislike or dislike/indifference (‘non-friends’). The mean differences in ‘friends’ scores on the motor performance and size variables were compared with the mean differences for ‘non-friends’ by analysis of variance. Although a consistent trend of greater similarity on the physical measures was observed for ‘friends’ as compared with ‘non-friends,’ the only significant result was for a variable representing dynamic strength. The influence of academic status on this significant result is pointed out.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonneyM. E.Relationship between social success, family size, socio-economic home backgrounds and intelligence. Sociometry, 1944, 9, 48–70.
2.
ByrneD.Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 713–715.
3.
ClarkeH. H.Application of measurement to health and physical education. (3rd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1959.
4.
ClarkeH. H., & CarterG. H.Oregon simplification of the strength and physical fitness indices for upper elementary, junior high and senior high school boys. Research Quarterly, 1959, 29, 3–10.
5.
CrattyB. S.Social dimensions of physical activity. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
6.
DaviesK.Human society. London: Macmillan, 1948.
7.
PotashinR.A sociometric study of children's friendships. Sociometry, 1946, 9, 48–70.
ThorpeJ. G.A sociometric study of London school children. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univer. of London, 1955.
10.
WetzelN. C.Assessing the physical condition of children: I. Case demonstration of failing growth and the determination of ‘par’ by the grid method. Journal of Pediatrics, 1943, 22, 82–110.
11.
YoshidaH.[Study on some determinants in the formation of friendship.]Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Toaama Univer., 1963, 11, 12–21. (Quoted in Child Development Abstracts, 1966, 40, 45.)
