3 experiments involving 48 Ss were conducted to study the effects of four variables (event frequency, test frequency, task difficulty, and mode of responding) on performance in a prolonged discrimination task. As in the typical vigilance study, decrements in performance were observed over time. The variables which generally affect the decrements in the vigilance task, however, did not produce significant effects when continuous discriminations were required.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakesC. H.Further toward a theory of vigilance. In BucknerD. N. & McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: a symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 127–170.
2.
BridgmanC. S., & WadeE. A.Sensitivity to changes in size, reaction time as a function of rate of change. WADC Technical Report53–199, 1953.
BucknerD. N.An individual-difference approach to explaining vigilance performance. In BucknerD. N. & McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: a symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 171–183.
5.
ColquhounW. P.The effect of “unwanted” signals on performance in a vigilance task. Ergonomics, 1961, 4, 41–52.
6.
JerisonH. J.On the decrement function in human vigilance. In BucknerD. N. & McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: a symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 199–216.
7.
KlippleA. G.Variables affecting the perception of angular change. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 25, 1025–1032.
8.
MackworthN. W.Researches on the measurement of human performance. Med. Res. Council (Eng.) Spec. Rep. Series, 1950, No. 268.
9.
McGrathJ. J.Some problems of definition and criteria in the study of vigilance. In BucknerD. N. & McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: a symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 227–246.
10.
SmithK. U.WargoL.JonesR., & SmithW. M.Delayed and space-displaced sensory feedback and learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 781–796.
