Diagrammatic presentations of verbal materials might be superior to tables because they emphasize contiguity among the items to be learned. In this study, diagrams were superior learning devices, although Ss preferred tables. As in prose research, a horizontal arrangement of the associates was superior but only if the concept label was left-most. The important factor seems to be whether dominant oculomotor habits correspond to the conceptual processing strategy employed by Ss.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonS. B., & RossS.Memory for items in a matrix. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 595–604.
2.
GossA. E.Paired-associates and connected discourse in the acquisition and retention of knowledge. Paper presented at a symposium on the Technology of Written Instruction, sponsored by ONR through Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1966.
3.
MillerG. A.The magical number seven, plus or minor two; some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev., 1956, 63, 81–97.
4.
NorthA. J., & JenkinsL. B.Reading speed and comprehension as a function of typography. J. appl. Psychol., 1951, 35, 225–228.
5.
TinkerM. A.Perceptual and oculomotor efficiency in reading material in vertical and horizontal arrangements. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 444–449.
