Research comparing normal and disabled readers on perceptual tasks is equivocal. Benton (1962) cites inadequate matching of groups on the factor of general intelligence as a reason for the disparate findings. Groups of disabled and normal readers (N = 20 each) were compared on the Bender-Gestalt, Auditory Discrimination Test, and a visual-motor matching task. No significant differences between the groups were found on the Bender-Gestalt and the visual-motor matching task. The normal readers were superior to disabled readers on the Auditory Discrimination Test (p < .01). Implications for early identification and remediation were discussed.
BenderL.A visual-motor Gestalt test and its clinical use. Baltimore: American Orthopsychiatry Assn, 1938. (Monogr. No. 3)
3.
BentonA.Dyslexia in relation to form perception and directional sense. In MoneyJ. (Ed.), Reading disability. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962. Pp. 81–102.
BryanQ.Relative importance of intelligence and visual perception in predicting reading achievement. California Journal of Educational Research, 1964, 15, 44–48.
6.
GoetzingerD.Auditory discrimination and visual perception in good and poor readers. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Larynology, 1960, 69, 121–137.
7.
KeoghB., & SmithC.Visuo-motor ability for school prediction. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 25, 101–110.
8.
KoppitzE.The Bender-Gestalt test for young children. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964.
9.
MalmquistE.Factors related to reading disabilities in the first grade. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1958.
10.
ThompsonB.Longitudinal study of auditory discrimination. Journal of Educational Research, 1963, 56, 376–378.
11.
WepmanJ.The Auditory Discrimination Test. Chicago: Language Research Assoc., 1958.
12.
WepmanJ.Auditory discrimination, speech and reading. Elementary School Journal, 1960, 60, 325–333.
