The direction of lateral eye-movements upon inward direction of attention or reflection is related to hypnotic susceptibility. A predominance of left eye-movements is associated with greater hypnotizability and also with humanistic interests, relatively poorer mathematical performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test, and clearer imagery. Results are discussed in terms of functional asymmetry of the brain.
CohenB. D.NoblinC. D.SilvermanA. J.PenickS. B.Functional asymmetry of the human brain. Science, 1968, 162, 475–477.
3.
CritchleyM.Speech and speech-loss in relation to duality of the brain. In MountcastleV. B. (Ed.), Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer. Press, 1962. Pp. 208–213.
4.
DayM. E.An eye-movement phenomenon relating to attention, thought and anxiety. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 19, 443–446.
5.
DayM. E.An eye-movement indicator of individual differences in the physiological organization of attentional processes and anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 1967, 66, 51–62.
6.
DayM. E.Attention, anxiety and psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1968, 5, 146–149.
7.
DukeJ. D.Lateral eye movement behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 1968, 78, 189–195.
HecaenH.De AjuriaguerraJ.Left-handedness: Manual superiority and cerebral dominance. New York: Grune & Stratron, 1964.
11.
HilgardE. R.Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965.
12.
HilgardJ. R. In HilgardE. R., Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965. Chap. 18.
13.
HilgardJ. R.Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, in press.
14.
JasperH. H.A laboratory study of diagnostic indices of bilateral neuromuscular organization in stutterers and normal speakers. Psychological Monographs, 1932, 43, 72–174.
LiskeE.HughesH. M.StoweO. E.Cross-correlation of human alpha activity: Normative data. EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1967, 22, 429–436.
17.
LondonP.HartJ. T.LeibovitzM. P.EEG alpha rhythms and susceptibility to hypnosis. Nature, 1968, 219, 71–72.
18.
MountcastleV. B. (Ed.) Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer. Press, 1962.
19.
NowlisD. P.RheadJ. C.Relation of eyes-closed resting EEG alpha activity to hypnotic susceptibility. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 1047–1050.
20.
RaneyE. T.Brain potentials and lateral dominance in identical twins. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939, 24, 21–39.
21.
RobinsonD. A.Eye movement control in primates. Science, 1968, 161, 1219–1224.
22.
SchoenZ. J.ScofieldC. F.A study of the relative neuromuscular efficiency of the dominant and non-dominant eye in binocular vision. Journal of General Psychology, 1935, 12, 156–181.
23.
SperryR. W.Split-brain approach to learning problems. In QuartonG. C.MelnechukT.SchmittF. O. (Eds.), The neurosciences. New York: Rockefeller Univer. Press, 1967. Pp. 714–722.
24.
SperryR. W.Hemisphere deconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist, 1968, 23, 723–733.
25.
WeitzenhofferA. M.HilgardE. R.Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962.
