Controls in Hypnotic Research: Comment on Schneck's (1969) Critique of Barber

Barber T. X. “Hypnosis” as a causal variable in present-day psychology: a critical analysis. Psychol. Rep., 1964, 14, 839–842.

Barber T. X. Reply to Conn and Conn's “Discussion of Barber's ‘Hypnosis as a causal variable …’.” Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis, 1967, 15, 111–117.

Barber T. X. Hypnosis: a scientific approach. Princeton, N. J.: Van Nostrand, 1969.

Chaves J. F. Hypnosis reconceptualized: an overview of Barber's theoretical and empirical work. Psychol. Rep., 1968, 22, 587–608.

Dalal A. S. An empirical approach to hypnosis. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 1966, 15, 151–157.

McPeake J. D. Hypnosis, suggestions, and psychosomatics. Dis. nerv. Syst., 1968, 29, 536–544.

Nichols D. C. A reconceptualization of the concept of hypnosis. In Lesse S. (Ed.), An evaluation of the results of the psychotherapies. Springfield, III.: Thomas, 1968. Chap. 11.

Richman D. N. A critique of two recent theories of hypnosis. Psychiat. Quart., 1965, 39, 278–292.

Schneck J. M. Observations on hypnotic dreams. Percept. mot. Skills, 1969, 28, 414.