The role of successive discrimination reversal in comparative behavioral analysis is briefly summarized with attention to recent criticism of the retention-decrement hypothesis that attempts to account for improvement in performance on this task. Data from 7 mammalian and 10 avian species are presented in support of this criticism. Alternative hypotheses are proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BittermanM. E.The evolution of intelligence. Scientific American, 1965, 212, 92–100.
2.
GonzalezR. C.BehrendE. R.BittermanM. E.Reversal learning and forgetting in birds and fish. Science, 1967, 158, 519–521.
3.
GossetteR. L.GossetteM. F.RiddellW.Comparisons of successive discrimination reversal performances among closely and remotely related avian species. Animal Behavior, 1966, 14, 560–564.
4.
GossetteR. L.KrausG.SpeissJ.Comparison of successive discrimination reversal (SDR) performances of seven mammalian species on a spatial task. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 12, 193–194.
5.
KrushinskiiL. V.Animal behavior: Its normal and abnormal development. New York: Consultants Bureau, 1962.
6.
LongoN.Probability learning and habit reversal in the cockroach. American Journal of Psychology, 1964, 77, 29–41.
7.
ThompsonR.Successive reversal of a position habit in an invertebrate. Science, 1957, 126, 163–164.
8.
WarrenJ. M.Reversal learning by Paradise fish (macropodus opercularis). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960, 53, 376–378.
9.
WienerN.HuppertF.Reversal learning and forgetting. Science, 1968, 160, 99.
