Abstract
56 male and 56 female undergraduates played a modified Prisoner's Dilemma game, two teams playing on each occasion. Ss chose a competitive or cooperative strategy toward both their opponents and partners on 20 trials. Partners received more cooperative choices (p < .01). Ratings on ability, sociometric, and motive traits improved for both ingroup and outgroup, however, ingroup ratings tended to improve more. The ingroup-outgroup differential was significantly stronger for game-relevant motive traits than for any other type of trait. The results support a “selective bias” hypothesis, which implies that bias in intergroup perceptions is especially great in the case of motives aroused by intergroup contact. A projective mechanism which defends against the perception of reprehensible motives in the ingroup might account for this selective bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.