Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

TSD techniques were used to evaluate the effect of the “set” variable on tachistoscopic recognition. Ss made judgments about the presence or absence of “set” words and control words in a background of visual noise. The resultant ROC curves showed an influence of perceptual sensitivity but no effect of response bias. The d' values for the set words were found to be significantly larger than those for the control words.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkin

Handbook of sampling for auditing and accounting. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

Broadbent

D. E.

Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychol. Rev., 1967, 74, 1–15.

Elliott

P. B.

Appendix 1—Tables of d’. In Swets

J. A.

(Ed.), Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley, 1964. Pp. 651–684.

Neisser

An experimental distinction between perceptual processes and verbal response. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 399–402.

Thorndike

E. L.

Lorge

The teacher's word book of 20,000 words. New York: Teacher's Coll., Columbia Univer., Bur. of Publ., 1944.

Winnick

W. A.

Luria

Zukor

W. J.

Two signal detection approaches to tachistoscopic recognition. Percept. mot. Skills, 1967, 24, 795–803.

A Signal Detection Approach to the Study of Set in Tachistoscopic Recognition

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References