Three measures were computed for each of 32 undergraduate Ss: (1) the rate at which simple RTs to auditory stimuli decrease with sound-intensity, (2) the rate at which numerical estimates of loudness increase over the same stimulus range, (3) the mean of 60 RTs to a 70-db auditory stimulus. A significant rho of .45 was found between the slopes of the RT and loudness functions, but neither slope value was significantly related to the mean RT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
McGillW.The slope of the loudness function: A puzzle. In GulliksenH. & MessickS. (Eds.), Psychological scaling. New York: Wiley, 1960. Pp. 67–81.
2.
ReasonJ. T.An investigation of some factors contributing to individual variation in motion sickness susceptibility. London: Ministry of Defence (Air), 1968. (Flying Personnel Research Committee Report No. 1277).
3.
StevensS. S.The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes—loudness. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 1–25.
4.
WoodworthR. S., & SchlosbergH.Experimental psychology. London: Methuen, 1958. Pp. 20–27.