This paper is one of a series dealing with, among other things, the psychology of theorizing. The next paper in the series will be a lengthy one proposing that attitude toward equilibrium theorizing varies inversely with capacity for Rorschachian inner creation, regardless of discipline or of object of theory (e.g., biological, economic, psychological, or social systems). The present paper may be regarded a prologue to it or a preview of its approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StarkS.Toward a psychology of knowledge: Hypotheses regarding Rorschach movement and creativity. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 839–859.
2.
StarkS.Experience, Rorschach responses, and role-taking (empathy): A dualistic suggestion. Percept. mot. Skills, 1968, 26, 287–294. (a)
3.
StarkS.A suggestion regarding drama, inner creation, and role-taking (empathy): I. Dramatic arts and dramatic dreaming. Percept. mot. Skills, 1968, in press. (b)
4.
StarkS.Toward a psychology of knowledge: IV. Further illustrations of the hypothesis regarding philosophical conservatism and Rorschach movement responses. Percept. mot. Skills, 1968, 26, 455–460. (c)
5.
SteinM. R.The poetic metaphors of sociology. In SteinM. & VidichA. (Eds), Sociology on trial. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1963. Pp. 173–182.
