Recent notes criticizing and defending the use of phenomenological observations in psychology are criticized for failing to take into account the means through which observations can be made objective and public. Objectivity is attained through the use of objects or instruments of measurement, and the public nature of an event is a function of its replicability from laboratory to laboratory. Phenomenological observations are seen from this point of view to be necessarily subjective and private.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrodyN.OppenheimP.Tensions in psychology between the methods of behaviorism and phenomenology. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 295–305.
2.
BrodyN.OppenheimP.Methodological differences between behaviorism and phenomenology in psychology. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 330–334.
3.
CarinaL.An experimental investigation of perceptual behavior in schizophrenics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Clark Univer., 1955.
4.
CollingwoodR. G.The idea of nature.Oxford: Oxford Univer. Press, 1945.
5.
ComalliP.WapnerS.WernerH.Perception of verticality in middle and old age. Journal of Psychology, 1959, 47, 259–266.
6.
HenleM.BaltimoreG.Portraits in straw. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 325–329.
7.
LiebertR.WapnerS.WernerH.Studies of the effects of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD-25). Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1957, 77, 193–201.
8.
TeuberH. L.MishkinM.Judgment of visual and postural vertical after brain injury. Journal of Psychology, 1954, 38, 161–175.
9.
WapnerS.WernerH.Perceptual development.Worcester: Clark Univer. Press, 1957.
10.
WernerH.WapnerS.ChandlerK.Experiments on sensory-tonic field theory of perception: II. Effect of supported and unsupported tilt of the body on the visual perception of verticality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951, 42, 346–350.
11.
ZanerR. M.Criticism of “Tensions in psychology between the methods of behaviorism and phenomenology.”Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 318–324.
