This study compared the accuracy of recall of connected meaningful material practiced under delayed auditory feedback with and without instructions to Ss that they would be asked to recall the material. No significant differences were found, confirming the results of a prior experiment. The relationship between retention of DAF-practiced material and voice change was insignificant, in marked contrast to a prior finding of a large and significant positive correlation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AusubelD. P.The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960, 51, 267–272.
2.
HarperR. B.KingD. J.Retention of material practiced under delayed auditory feedback: Preliminary observations on two additional variables. Psychological Reports, 1967, 21, 431–432.
3.
KingD. J.Immediate memory of connected meaningful material practiced under delayed auditory feedback. Psychological Reports, 1963, 13, 91–96.
4.
KingD. J.Note on delayed auditory feedback, exposure time and retention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 497–498.
5.
KingD. J.Predicting the amount of forgetting of connected meaningful material presented under delayed auditory feedback. Journal of General Psychology, in press.
6.
KingD. J.DodgeA.The influence of oral recall on immediate and delayed memory for meaningful material practiced under delayed auditory feedback. Journal of Psychology, 1965, 59, 141–147.
7.
KingD. J.WalkerH. J.The effect of prompting on the immediate recall of meaningful material practiced under delayed auditory feedback. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 483–488.
8.
KingD. J.WolfS.The influence of delayed auditory feedback on immediate and delayed memory. Journal of Psychology, 1965, 59, 131–139.
