Five measures of speech and linguistic ability were used to evaluate differences between athetoids and spastics matched on CA and IQ. The measures used were Integrated Articulation Test, speech articulation ratings, Abstraction Test, Sound Discrimination Test, and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. The spastic children were superior to athetoid children on ratings of speech intelligibility and ability in articulation. The differences between the two groups on the sound discrimination, abstraction and vocabulary tests were nonsignificant, thus no significant differences were found between subclasses in auditory decoding as measured.
DunnL. M.HarleyR. K.Comparability of Peabody, Ammons, Van Alstyne, and Columbia test scores with cerebral palsied children. Exceptional Children, 1959, 16, 70–74.
HeltmanW.PeacherW. G.Misarticulation and diadokokinesis in the spastic paralytic. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1943, 8, 137–145.
5.
HopkinsT. W.BiceH. V.ColtonK. C.Evaluation and education of the cerebral palsied child, New Jersey study. Washington, D. C.: International Council for Exceptional Children, 1954.
6.
IrwinO. C.A manual of articulation testing for use with children with cerebral palsy. Cerebral Palsy Review, 1961, 22, 1–24.
7.
IrwinO. C.HammillD. D.An abstraction test for use with cerebral palsied children. Cerebral Palsy Review, 1964, 25, 3–9. (a).
8.
IrwinO. C.HammillD. D.Some results with an abstraction test with cerebral palsied children. Cerebral Palsy Review, 1964, 25, 10–11. (b).
9.
IrwinO. C.HammillD. D.Effects of types, extent, and degree of cerebral palsy on three measures of language. Cerebral Palsy Journal, 1965, 26, 7–9.
10.
IrwinO. C.JensenP. J.A test of sound discrimination for use with cerebral palsied children, Form A. Cerebral Palsy Review, 1963, 24, 5–11.
11.
RutherfordB.A comprehensive study of loudness, pitch, rate, rhythm, and quality of children handicapped by cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1944, 9, 263–271.
