Abstract
To determine the relation of pattern spacing to improved learning with large pattern-small background combinations, rats were trained with: 1-sq. in. patterns on narrowly-spaced 4-sq. in. backgrounds (NS 1:4); 1-sq. in. patterns on widely-spaced 4-sq. in. backgrounds (WS 1:4); 1-sq. in. patterns on 16-sq. in. backgrounds (1:16). Patterns were closest together for the NS 1:4 condition and the same distance apart for WS 1:4 and 1:16. For a triangle-circle discrimination, learning was best for NS 1:4, poorer for WS 1:4 and poorest for 1:16. For a diamond-square discrimination, NS 1:4 was superior to WS 1:4 and 1:16 which did not differ. Conclusions were that decreased pattern spacing (a) improves learning and (b) is more critical for difficult problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
