Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that children's awareness of their own bodily attributes is more articulated and accurate than their conception of those of the opposite sex, a modified D-A-P Test was given to 151 Ss (Grades K to 6). Instructions were to draw frontal pictures of the self and of an opposite sex age-mate, both standing up and wearing bathing suits. Sketches were compared for detail, manner of depiction, symmetry, proportion, size, placement, and line quality. Except for size and for depictions of hair, mouth, and eyes, protocols showed no significant differences between self- and opposite-sex drawings. Individual graphic styles were highly consistent. A significant proportion drew larger, but not qualitatively superior, self-representations than non-self figures. Results were related to the development of body image, projective interpretations of figure drawings, realism, and IQ. It was concluded that, for the aspects assessed, children seem equally aware of the bodily attributes of both sexes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowers

N. D.

Giles

G. C.

Social class, sex and age differences in sex role identity as inferred from children's drawings of men and women. Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Assn, New York, September, 1966.

Buck

J. N.

House-Tree-Person drawing technique. In Weider

(Ed.), Contributions toward medical psychology: Theory and diagnostic methods. Vol. 2. New York: Ronald, 1953. Pp. 688–701.

Cureton

E. E.

Mental age equivalents for the Revised Stanford-Binet Vocabulary Test. J. consult. Psychol., 1954, 18, 381–384.

Dennis

The human figure drawings of Bedouins. J. soc. Psychol., 1960, 52, 209–219.

Frisch

G. R.

Handler

Differences in Negro and white drawings: A cultural interpretation. Percept. mot. Skills, 1967, 24, 667–670.

Gellert

Children's conceptions of the content and functions of the human body. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1962, 65, 293–405.

Gellert

The development of conceptions of the body image. Paper read at Soc. Res. Child Developm., Berkeley, April, 1963.

Gellert

The development of self-recognition from anterior, posterior and side views of the human body. Paper read at West. Psychol. Assn, Portland, April, 1964.

Gellert

The transition from mirror image to diagonal sets in children's lateralizations of human figures. Paper read at Soc. Res. Child Developm., Minneapolis, March, 1965.

10.

Gellert

Children's lateralizations of human figures: Analysis of a developmental transition. J. Psychol., in press.

11.

Gellert

Stern

J. B.

Age and sex differences in children's judgments of their height and body proportions. Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Assn, Los Angeles, September, 1964.

12.

Goodenough

F. L.

Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1926.

13.

Harris

D. B.

Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963.

14.

Haworth

M. R.

Normington

C. J.

A sexual differentiation scale for the D-A-P Test. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 441–449.

15.

Kubie

L. S.

Body symbolization and the development of language. Psychoanal. Quart., 1931, 3, 430–444.

16.

Machover

Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1949.

17.

Murphy

M. M.

Sexual differentiation of male and female job applicants on the Draw-A-Person Test. J. clin. Psychol., 1957, 13, 87–88.

18.

Rickey

M. H.

Qualitative superiority of the “self” figure in children's drawings. J. clin. Psychol., 1965, 21, 59–61.

19.

Sherman

L. J.

Sexual differentiation or artistic ability?

J. clin. Psychol., 1958, 14, 170–171.

20.

Swenson

C. H.

Newton

K. R.

The development of sexual differentiation of the Draw-A-Person Test. J. clin. Psychol., 1955, 11, 417–419.

21.

Witkin

H. A.

Dyk

R. B.

Fatterson

H. F.

Goodenough

D. R.

Karp

S. A.

Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.

Comparison of Children's Self-Drawings with Their Drawings of other Persons

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References