A technique to average GSR across Ss is proposed to facilitate detection of deception. Differential responsivity to “lie” vs “neutral” stimuli is augmented by averaging out idiosyncratic responses to neutral stimuli. Its feasibility was demonstrated by recording individual and group GSRs of Ss questioned in small groups. The probability of detecting shared information was greatly increased. Limitations and possible applications of the technique are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GustafsonL. A.OrneM. T.Effects of heightened motivation on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1963, 47, 408–411.
2.
GustafsonL. A.OrneM. T.The effects of task and method of stimulus presentation on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1964, 48, 383–387.
3.
GustafsonL. A.OrneM. T.Effects of perceived role and role success on the detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 412–417. (a).
4.
GustafsonL. A.OrneM. T.The effects of verbal responses on the laboratory detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 1965, 2, 10–13. (b).
5.
HanselC. E. M.Measurement of “group responses.”Quarterly Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1951, 2, 6–7.
6.
LykkenD. T.The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1960, 44, 258–262.
7.
ThackrayR. I.OrneM. T.Methodological studies in detection of deception. United States Army Medical Research and Development Command Report, filed with Defense Documentation Center No. AD-645102, January, 1967.
