Abstract
This critique questions the experimental design, controls and data analysis of a recent pupillary response experiment by Hess and Polt (1966).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bergum
B.
Lehr
D. J.
Prediction of stimulus approach: Core measures experiment II . Rochester, New York : Xerox Corp. , 1966 . (Res. Rep. R66–36).
2.
Hess
E. H.
Attitude and pupil size . Sci. Amer. , 1965 , 212 , 46 –54 .
3.
Hess
E. H.
Polt
J. M.
Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli . Science , 1960 , 132 , 349 –350 .
4.
Hess
E. H.
Polt
J. M.
Changes in pupil size as a measure of taste difference . Percept. mot. Skills , 1966 , 23 , 451 –455 .
5.
Lehr
D. J.
Bergum
B.
Note on pupillary adaptation . Percept. mot. Skills , 1966 , 23 , 917 –918 .
6.
Stewart
R. W.
Jensen
D. D.
GSR, pupillary dilation, and response latency to words differing in entropy . Paper read at Midwest. Psychol. Assn, Chicago, May , 1966 .
7.
Woodmansee
J. J.
Methodological problems in pupillographic experiments . Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Assn, New York, Sept. , 1966 .