A modification of Fleishman's (1957) Response Orientation Device was given to 192 children in Grades K to 3. The predominant perceptual response of younger children decreased with age with a concomitant increase in responses to spatial relations based on an external reference point. Socioeconomic level (as represented by school) and reading group assignment, but not sex, interacted with age and were positively related to spatial development. Display alignment had a limited effect on the type of response made. The results were interpreted in terms of Piaget and Inhelder's (1956) theory of spatial development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirchH. G.BelmontL.Auditory-visual integration, intelligence and reading ability in school children. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 20, 295–305.
2.
BraineL. G.Age changes in the mode of perceiving geometric forms. Psychon. Sci., 1965, 2, 155–156.
3.
CookT. W.ShephardA. H.Performance on several control-display relationships as a function of age and sex. Percept. mot. Skills, 1958, 8, 339–345.
4.
DavidsonH. P.Study of reversals in young children. J. genet. Psychol., 1934, 45, 452–462.
5.
DavidsonH. P.A study of the confusing letters b, d, p, q. J. genet. Psychol., 1935, 47, 458–468.
6.
FleishmanE. A.Factor structure in relation to task difficulty in psycho-motor performance. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1957, 17, 522–532.
7.
GhentL.Recognition by children of realistic figures presented in various orientations. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 249–256.
8.
GhentL.Form and its orientation: A child's eye view. Amer. J. Psychol., 1961, 74, 177–190.
9.
GhentL.BernsteinL.Influence of the orientation of geometric forms on their recognition by children. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 95–101.
10.
GhentL.BernsteinL.GoldweberA. M.Preferences for orientation of form under varying conditions. Percept. mot. Skills, 1960, 11, 46.
11.
GreeneP. M.SmithK. U.Maturation of performance with space displaced vision. Science, 1960, 141, 727–728.
12.
HumphriesM.ShephardA. H.Performance on several control-display arrangements as a function of age. Canad. J. Psychol., 1955, 2, 231–238.
13.
HumphriesM.ShephardA. H.Age and training in the development of a perceptual-motor skill. Percept. mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 3–11.
14.
LovellK.A follow-up study of some aspects of the work of Piaget and Inhelder on the child's conception of space. Brit. J. educ. Psychol., 1959, 29, 104–117.
15.
PiagetJ.InhelderB.A child's conception of space.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956.
16.
RiceC.The orientation of plane figures as a factor in their perception by children. Child Develpm., 1930, 1, 111–143.
17.
RosenblithJ. F.Judgments of simple geometric figures by children. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 947–990.
18.
RudelR.TeuberH. L.Discrimination of direction of line in children. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1963, 56, 892–898.
19.
SekulerR. W.RosenblithJ.Discrimination of direction of line and effect of stimulus alignment. Psychon. Sci., 1964, 1, 143–144.
20.
ShephardA. H.AbbeyD. S.HumphriesM.Age and sex in relation to perceptual-motor performances on several control-display relations on the TCC. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 103–118.
21.
SmithI. M.Spatial ability.San Diego: Knapp, 1964.
22.
SmithK. U.SmithW. M.Perception and motion.Philadelphia: Saunders, 1962.
